當前位置:文範網 >

演講稿 >英語演講稿 >

有頭腦的人的選擇(精選多篇)

有頭腦的人的選擇(精選多篇)

第一篇:有頭腦的人的選擇

有頭腦的人的選擇(精選多篇)

the thinking man's choice

contact is made. nerves order the heart to pump faster. adrenalin surges to action. nerves constrict the blood vessels in the extremities of the body. skin temperature drops. fingers and toes grow colder. blood pressure jump. an alcoholic or a dope addict in the first stages of a "cure"? a man being catapulted into outer space? no! these effects stem from smoking just one cigarette.

the united states public health service is issuing continual warnings to smokers. if they abstain completely from smoking, their chances of acquiring lung cancer will be one in 275. their chances of dying of lung cancer will be one in 10 if they become heavy smokers─two or more packs a day. lung cancer is fatal in 95 per cent of all cases.

but in spite of glaring evidence and frequent warnings, the public is smoking more and more. the department of agriculture estimates that this year's consumption of cigarettes will reach 180 packs per person fifteen years of age and over. how many cigarettes does this mean per person?─3600.

why is smoking such an important problem? because smoking is not a mere habit, as so many think it is. no, it is more serious than that. a habit can be broken easily enough, but an addiction cannot. smokers lapse into helplessness! daniel schubert, of the university of chicago, quizzed 226 students at a large northwestern college about their smoking habits─why they started, what satisfaction they got, and if they wanted to stop. according to schubert, they wanted to quit smoking; but they couldn't.

if one is addicted to cigarettes, he is dependent upon them physically, as well as psychologically. what is it, if it is not addiction, that motivates a man to go out in sub-zero weather to buy a pack of cigarettes? if necessary, he will drive ten miles late at night to find an open drugstore. what is it, if it is not addiction, that makes a moocher of an otherwise charming young girl?

i was talking to a professor not long ago who had just quit smoking. he told me what most of you already know─that once the habit is started, watch out! it is next to impossible to stop smoking. i asked him how he ever managed to quit when he had been smoking over a pack a day for ten years. listen to his story.

"well, i cut down to one-half pack a day for the first week.

i was touchy most of the time. the slightest irritation made my nerves jangle and my head want to explode. the next week i smoked five cigarettes a day and had an even worse case of nerves. then the following week i chewed gum and sucked on mints, candy, and pipe stems. frankly, i wasn't sure from one moment to the next if i could keep going. somehow i made it."

many of you know what this professor is talking about; you, too, have tried to break the addiction, but have failed. in the few minutes we have here today we can analyze the motives at the root of our smoking problem.

perhaps we can assure those who do not smoke, (and i am happy i can still include myself in this group), to nip in the bud the urges of those who are (本文 來自本站)about to begin smoking, and to encourage to cut-down those who are already confirmed smokers.

let's begin with group pressures. we race to maturity, to grow up all at once. we want poise, selfconfidence, and lots of friends; we want to be accepted.

this need for acceptance reminds me of an incident that occurred in a campus sorority house during the "rushing period" last fall. a sorority member offered a rushee a cigarette. eager to please and not to seem different, the girl blurted out a confident, "oh, yes, i'd love one!" the active struck a match, was calmly extending it toward the rushee when the flustered freshman met the active half-way with cigarette in hand. the active was thunderstruck. you can imagine her mixed emotions while striving to stifle her amusement and at the same time to understand that the poor rushee had never smoked before. in the excitement of the moment she was only concerned with being accepted.

then there is the girl who is seated in a group, not knowing what to do with her hands. first, she rolls and unrolls the curl behind her left ear; then she rummages in her purse for some article to wave as a prop. an inspiration flashes, and she remembers the package of kents in her coat pocket. why didn't she think of them before? she always did think women who smoked looked mature. what a convenient prop to have brought along. convenient? yes, sophisticated? no. years ago, a woman was thought sophisticated if she knew how to smoke. men were impressed. but today the picture is changing, as everyone knows how to smoke─age eleven or up. perhaps now the novelty should be the nonsmoker?

now i ask you. is a woman charming if she can sit with her hands folded gracefully in her lap, or is she more charming while fidgeting with one cigarette after another? and you men specifically─which do you prefer─the lady who needs no props to have poise, or the lady who thinks a cigarette makes her more alluring to you? take a good look at a woman sometime when she is inhaling. she drags hard, makes a puckering noise with her lips, tosses her head back drawing a deep breath─then bellows the smoke out like the gust from a rocket launching. she may even go so far as to blow smoke rings for you. is she dainty? is she feminine?

the power of suggestion is another strong motivating factor in our lives. haven't you watched someone yawn and suddenly felt your own mouth gape open. you let the power of suggestion get the best of you; and before you realized it, you, too, were yawning. now, couldn't this same power induce you to smoke? why not, especially through the medium of advertising.

i am reminded of a "mostly malarky" cartoon that i recently clipped out of the chicago tribune. malarky strolled into a drugstore. standing before the counter, he scratched his head in silence. finally, he muttered to the clerk, "i want the thinking man's cigarette, but i can't seem to think of the name." poor malarky. he only wanted a package of viceroy as the "thinking man's cigarette." after all, if he is a thinking man, as he thinks he is, he should, by all means, smoke his own brand.

advertisers are further toying with men's egos by appealing to their hidden desires to be energetic, vigorous, and potent. marlboro, with its hairy-chested male smoker, has set the pace. the cigarette is made to project the image of a rugged, rough-and-ready guy. doesn't this explain why many cigarette ads display great flexing of masculine muscles?

the woman, too, is a victim of advertising. vogue cigarettes catch her eye. why? because they come in pastels. how perfectly exciting for the female world! just think! she can now buy cigarettes to match her wardrobe; and what's more, she can purchase matching cigarette cases and lighters in any color of the rainbow, with jewels or without.

yes, we are frequently victims of suggestive devices. dr. ernest dichtter, head of the institute for motivational research, has conducted a series of studies for ad agencies on the subject of smoking. he states, "people smoke, not because of the taste of cigarettes, but because smoking provides them with certain psychological satisfactions they can get in no other way." he adds that cigarettes are involved in a man's struggle for survival, stability, and security. i am afraid i cannot agree with dr. dichter, for i believe that a man can survive and can find security without cigarettes. he needs food, he needs shelter, he needs love and companionship; but can't he satisfy these needs in ways other than smoking?

rationalization makes a strong impact on our lives. are we cultivating rationalizations as an excuse to smoke? i am afraid we are. no doubt 50 per cent of us here have used as an excuse to continue smoking, this very common remark, "if i ever stopped smoking, i would gain ten pounds." perhaps! a cigarette at 4p.m. does not contain the calories that a milkshake does. but the healthy way to lose excess pounds is to eat the right kind and the right amount of food.

we again rationalize when we buy filter tip cigarettes. we assure ourselves that the filter reduces any danger, but according to the july, 1957 edition of reader's digest, "the tar and nicotine reduction possible through a filter ranges from 7 to 17 per cent. these percentages are too small to be really protective." with a perfect filter no smoke could seep through─just hot air. so many people believe that filters are the solution that filter tips will account for about half of this year's output. can't we admit that we are being duped to form a habit that is detrimental to mankind─a habit that leads to addiction?

so you begin to wonder if maybe you should quit smoking─that, after all, you are an individual. what would happen to you tomorrow if some conclusive proof should suddenly come forth─proof that cigarettes are a one-way ticket to death? what would you do? who do not smoke, you've seen why others start the habit and the risks they are taking. be on your guard. you, who have the urge to start smoking─you are perched on a fence and can jump to either side. which will you choose? and you, who are already confirmed smokers, are now confronted with the hardest question of all. if you wanted to stop smoking, "could you? could you break the addiction?"

jean nicot, the frenchman who gave his name to nicotine, believed that he had discovered a miracle drug. today we try to filter out nicotine because of its harmful nature. the modern jean nicots believe that smoking makes the woman more attractive, more desirable─the man more masculine, more independent.

we say we are thinking men! well, are we thinking? cigarette, anyone?

到位了。神經命令心臟跳動加快。腎上腺激素開始湧動。神經促使人手腳處的血管開始收縮。皮膚的温度下降了,手指、腳趾漸漸變涼,血壓升高了。這些症狀是不是發生在一個酒鬼或一個吸毒成癮者接受"治療"的第一階段?抑或是一個人正被彈射到外層太空?不!它們僅來自於吸了一支煙。

美國公共健康服務中心正不斷地給煙民們發出警告。他們被告知:如果他們徹底戒煙的話,他們得肺癌的可能將是1/275。如果他們成了一天吸兩包煙以上的癮君子的話,那他們死於肺癌的比例將是1/10。同時必須指出,100個肺癌患者中有95人將最終死亡。

然而,儘管這些吸煙有害健康的證據毋容置疑,並不斷向人們發出警告,但吸煙人數還在不斷增多。農業部估計,今年的香煙消費量將達到人均180包(15歲以上者)。這將意味着每人吸多少支?3600支。

為什麼吸煙是一個如此嚴峻的問題?因為它不是許多人所認為的只是一個習慣問題。不,它遠比習慣來得厲害。一個習慣能輕易地改變,而吸煙一旦上了癮,就難以自拔了。芝加哥大學的丹尼爾·舒爾伯格曾經對西北一所較大的大學的226名學生就吸煙習慣問題做過一次調查──是什麼原因使他們開始吸煙的?他們從吸煙中獲得了什麼快感?他們是否有戒煙的打算?從舒爾伯格的調查結果來看,那些學生想戒煙,但是辦不到。

如果一個人吸煙上了癮,他即在生理上對香煙產生了依賴感。如果這不是一種癮的話,那它是什麼?是什麼力量能促使一個人在零度以下的惡劣天氣裏出門去買煙?如果必要的話,他甚至會在深夜開十英里車去尋找一個仍在營業的雜貨店。如果那不是一種癮的話,它又會是什麼?它怎麼會使原先一個迷人的女孩變成一個無所事事、遊手好閒的人?

不久前,我和一個剛剛戒煙的教授進行了一次談話。他告訴我你們大多數人已知道的:一旦抽上香煙,當心!因為要戒煙幾乎不大可能。於是,我問他,他是如何養成了一天吸一包煙以上的習慣並持續了十年之後,能成功地戒掉了煙癮。讓我們來聽聽他的故事吧!

"唔,我在一開始的第一個星期裏減少了吸煙的數量,每天只抽半包。在那段時間裏,我很容易發脾氣。稍有點不如意,就會使我極度煩躁,腦袋也像要裂開似的。第二個星期開始,我每天抽五支煙,那時,我的精神狀態更糟了。在接着的第三個星期裏,我試着嚼口香糖和薄荷糖,當然還有煙斗杆。坦白地説,能不能堅持下去,我也不能肯定。可不知怎麼的,我還是做到了。"

聽了他的故事,你們中的許多人知道他在説什麼了。因為你們也曾經嘗試過戒煙,只是你失敗了。現在,讓我們花幾分鐘來分析一下吸煙的根本動機。

這樣説,也許我們能夠讓那些不吸煙的人(我很高興我自己屬於這一類),在要吸煙時就打消這個念頭,並鼓勵那些已經上癮的煙民減少吸煙數量。

讓我們從外界壓力影響這個角度開始分析。我們希望成熟,希望一下子能長大。我們需要平衡、自信和朋友,我們更期盼被人接受。

這種希望接受的願望使我想到了一件事。那是去年秋天,在一所大學的女生聯誼晚會裏發生的事。那時,正在舉行一個爭取新會員的活動。一個聯誼會成員給一位新生一支煙。這個新進大學的女孩急切地想取悦他人,不願做得與眾不同,於是,她自信地脱口而出:"噢,好的,我很想來一支!"於是,那個遞煙的人劃了根火柴,平靜地伸出手去給她點煙。與此同時,這個新生慌慌張張地拿着煙迎了上去。看着她的樣子,遞煙的人震驚了。你可想像那複雜的表情。一方面,她努力抑制着自己,不讓自己笑出聲來;另一方面,她又深深地理解這個可憐的新生──她以前從未吸過煙。而這個新來的女孩在這個激動的時刻,什麼也不顧,只在意她是否被接受了。

讓我們再來看一個例子。在一堆人中,坐着一個女孩,她不知道自己的手該怎麼放。一開始,她用手反覆地撥弄着左耳後的捲髮,接着翻弄着錢袋,想找東西握在手裏,這樣可顯得自然些。突然一個念頭從她腦子裏冒出來,她記起在外衣口袋裏還有一包健牌煙。為什麼她不早些想到它們呢?她一直認為吸煙的女人看上去更成熟一些。拿着香煙打發雙手該有多方便啊!方便?是的。老練?不!在許多年前,一個女人要是知道如何吸煙,人們會認為她很老練,男人們也會被她吸引住的。但是現在,這種觀念早就不存在了,因為,現在每個人都知道如何吸煙,甚至八歲的孩子也不例外。現在,不吸煙可能反而是件新鮮事了。

現在讓我來問你,如果一個女人坐着,雙手交叉着優雅地放在膝上,而另一個女人,雙手一支接着一支地抽着煙,哪一個更有魅力?有一個女人不需要任何物體來平衡她的手腳,另一個女人卻認為煙能使她對男人更具誘惑力。作為一個男人,具體地説──你喜歡哪一個?好好看看一個女人吸煙的樣子,你會看到,她狠命地吸煙,撅起雙脣發出一陣"嘶嘶"聲,接着往後一仰,把煙深深地吸了進去然後就像火箭發射時噴出的尾氣一樣,大口地噴出煙霧。她甚至還會向你吐煙圈。這麼一個女人,你能説她俊俏,你能説她有女人味?

在我們的生活中,暗示的力量是促使我們行動的另一個關鍵因素。你有沒有這樣的經歷,當你看到別人打呵欠時,你也會不由自主地打起呵欠來?原來,這已影響了你,在你還沒意識到你將幹什麼之前,你已經這麼幹了。那麼,這種同樣的暗示力量會不會也促使你去吸煙呢?怎麼不會呢?尤其是廣告媒體的影響。

我回想起最近我從《芝加哥論壇》上剪下來的一個名叫"莫斯特立·馬拉基"的卡通畫,內容講的是馬拉基逛進了一個雜貨店,他站在櫃枱前一言不發,卻使勁地抓腦袋,最後,他向售貨員嘀咕道:"我想買有頭腦的人吸的煙,可是我好像想不起它的名字來了。"可憐的馬拉基,他想要的僅僅是一包總督牌香煙,廣告商卻把它描繪成有頭腦的人抽的香煙。畢竟,每個人都認為自己是一個有頭腦的人,人都是這樣認為自己的,他無論如何應該吸自己牌子的煙。

廣告商們不斷地玩弄男人的自我,即激發他們那種想要精力充沛,充滿活力、健康力的內心願望。萬寶路,起了帶頭作用。它的煙盒上是一個長滿胸毛的男子漢。於是,萬寶路就有了一個粗獷的、豪放不羈的男人形象。這難道不正解釋了為什麼眾多的香煙廣告裏,展示的往往都是男性肌肉的強有力的收縮嗎?

女性,同樣也是廣告的受害者。時髦的香煙往往吸引了她們。為什麼呢?因為那些煙往往以彩色粉筆狀出現。女人的世界是多麼令人激動啊!試想一下,她們能夠買到與衣服相配的煙了。此外,她們還能夠買到與煙匹配的五彩繽紛的或鑲嵌着奪目的珠寶的煙盒及打火機。

的確,我們常常是帶有誘導性物件的受害者。動機研究院的負責人歐內斯特·狄徹特博士,曾為廣告公司在吸煙方面進行過一系列的研究。他指出:"人們吸煙並不為了煙的味道,而是因為通過吸煙,他們能夠獲得一種通過其他方式難以得到的心理上的滿足。"他補充道,香煙同一個人為了生存、穩定、安全而奮鬥有很大的關係。我恐怕不能同意他的觀點。我認為,一個人沒有煙也能夠找到安全感。一個人需要的是食物、住房、愛與友情。難道他不能通過吸煙以外的方式來滿足他的這些需要嗎?

自我辯解對我們的生活有很大的影響。我們是不是在把自我辯解用作吸煙的藉口?恐怕是這樣的。毫無疑問,我們中有一半的人把這類話作為一個藉口來繼續吸煙,"我一旦戒煙,我體重將增加10磅。"可能會這樣!在下午4點吸的一支煙裏不含有一杯牛奶所含有的熱量。但是,健康的減肥方法不是通過吸煙,而是吃合適的和適量的食物。

當我們購買帶過濾嘴的香煙時,我們又自己辯解、找理由,我們使自己相信這個過濾嘴能過濾掉任何有害物質。但根據1957年7月版的《讀者文摘》上的一篇報道:"通過一個過濾嘴,焦油和尼古丁含量可能會減少7%~17%。可這百分比太小,遠遠起不到真正的保護作用。"如搞出一個完美的過濾嘴,那就沒有煙而只有熱空氣能夠通過了。如此多的人相信這種過濾嘴是一個解決吸煙有害的好方法,以致於它的產量大約佔今年捲煙總產量的50%。難道我們不承認我們正在受騙,慢慢養成一種對人類有害的習慣──一種會讓人沉溺於其中,難以自拔的習慣?

因此,你開始懷疑你是否有可能戒煙──畢竟,人是一個獨立的人。如果明天一些結論性的論據一下子成真,完全證明了香煙是通向死亡的單程票,那麼,對你有什麼影響?你會怎麼做?你,不吸煙的人,親眼目睹了為什麼另一些人染上了吸煙的習慣,他們正冒着怎樣巨大的風險。所以,當心!你,有想吸煙慾望的人,正坐在欄杆上,你隨時可跳向任何一邊。你會選擇哪一邊呢?嗨,你,一個已經吸煙成癮的人,現在正面臨着嚴峻的問題。如果你想戒煙的話,"你能嗎?你能剋制你的煙癮嗎?"

讓·尼古丁,這個給尼古丁命名的法國人,相信他發現了一種神奇的藥物。今天,我們試圖把尼古丁過濾掉,因為它是有害的。而現代的讓·尼古丁們卻相信吸煙能使女人更有魅力,更令人嚮往,男人更男性化,更獨立。

我們自認為是有頭腦的人。那麼,我們真的有頭腦了嗎?香煙,誰想來一支?

第二篇:有頭腦的人的選擇

the thinking man's choice contact is made. nerves order the heart to pump faster. adrenalin surges to action. nerves constrict the blood vessels in the extremities of the body. skin temperature drops. fingers and toes grow colder. blood pressure jump. an alcoholic or a dope addict in the first stages of a "cure"? a man being catapulted into outer space? no! these effects stem from smoking just one cigarette. the united states public health service is issuing continual warnings to smokers. if they abstain completely from smoking, their chances of acquiring lung cancer will be one in 275. their chances of dying of lung cancer will be one in 10 if they become heavy smokers─two or more packs a day. lung cancer is fatal in 95 per cent of all cases. but in spite of glaring evidence and frequent warnings, the public is smoking more and more. the department of agriculture estimates that this year's consumption of cigarettes will reach 180 packs per person fifteen years of age and over. how many cigarettes does this mean per person?─3600. why is smoking such an important problem? because smoking is not a mere habit, as so many think it is. no, it is more serious than that. a habit can be broken easily enough, but an addiction cannot. smokers lapse into helplessness! daniel schubert, of the university of chicago, quizzed 226 students at a large northwestern college about their smoking habits─why they started, what satisfaction they got, and if they wanted to stop. according to schubert, they wanted to quit smoking; but they couldn't. if one is addicted to cigarettes, he is dependent upon them physically, as well as psychologically. what is it, if it is not addiction, that motivates a man to go out in sub-zero weather to buy a pack of cigarettes? if necessary, he will drive ten miles late at night to find an open drugstore. what is it, if it is not addiction, that makes a moocher of an otherwise charming young girl? i was talking to a professor not long ago who had just quit smoking. he told me what most of you already know─that once the habit is started, watch out! it is next to impossible to stop smoking. i asked him how he ever managed to quit when he had been smoking over a pack a day for ten years. listen to his story. "well, i cut down to one-half pack a day for the first week. i was touchy most of the time. the slightest irritation made my nerves jangle and my head want to explode. the next week i smoked five cigarettes a day and had an even worse case of nerves. then the following week i chewed gum and sucked on mints, candy, and pipe stems. frankly, i wasn't sure from one moment to the next if i could keep going. somehow i made it." many of you know what this professor is talking about; you, too, have tried to break the addiction, but have failed. in the few minutes we have here today we can analyze the motives at the root of our smoking problem. perhaps we can assure those who do not smoke, (and i am happy i can still include myself in this group), to nip in the bud the urges of those who are about to begin smoking, and to encourage to cut-down those who are already confirmed smokers. let's begin with group pressures. we race to maturity, to grow up all at once. we want poise, selfconfidence, and lots of friends; we want to be accepted. this need for acceptance reminds me of an incident that occurred in a campus sorority house during the "rushing period" last fall. a sorority member offered a rushee a cigarette. eager to please and not to seem different, the girl blurted out a confident, "oh, yes, i'd love one!" the active struck a match, was calmly extending it toward the rushee when the flustered freshman met the active half-way with cigarette in hand. the active was thunderstruck. you can imagine her mixed emotions while striving to stifle her amusement and at the same time to understand that the poor rushee had never smoked before. in the excitement of the moment she was only concerned with being accepted. then there is the girl who is seated in a group, not knowing what to do with her hands. first, she rolls and unrolls the curl behind her left ear; then she rummages in her purse for some article to wave as a prop. an inspiration flashes, and she remembers the package of kents in her coat pocket. why didn't she think of them before? she always did think women who smoked looked mature. what a convenient prop to have brought along. convenient? yes, sophisticated? no. years ago, a woman was thought sophisticated if she knew how to smoke. men were impressed. but today the picture is changing, as everyone knows how to smoke─age eleven or up. perhaps now the novelty should be the nonsmoker? now i ask you. is a woman charming if she can sit with her hands folded gracefully in her lap, or is she more charming while fidgeting with one cigarette after another? and you men specifically─which do you prefer─the lady who needs no props to have poise, or the lady who thinks a cigarette makes her more alluring to you? take a good look at a woman sometime when she is inhaling. she drags hard, makes a puckering noise with her lips, tosses her head back drawing a deep breath─then bellows the smoke out like the gust from a rocket launching. she may even go so far as to blow smoke rings for you. is she dainty? is she feminine? the power of suggestion is another strong motivating factor in our lives. haven't you watched someone yawn and suddenly felt your own mouth gape open. you let the power of suggestion get the best of you; and before you realized it, you, too, were yawning. now, couldn't this same power induce you to smoke? why not, especially through the medium of advertising. i am reminded of a "mostly malarky" cartoon that i recently clipped out of the chicago tribune. malarky strolled into a drugstore. standing before the counter, he scratched his head in silence. finally, he muttered to the clerk, "i want the thinking man's cigarette, but i can't seem to think of the name." poor malarky. he only wanted a package of viceroy as the "thinking man's cigarette." after all, if he is a thinking man, as he thinks he is, he should, by all means, smoke his own brand. advertisers are further toying with men's egos by appealing to their hidden desires to be energetic, vigorous, and potent. marlboro, with its hairy-chested male smoker, has set the pace. the cigarette is made to project the image of a rugged, rough-and-ready guy. doesn't this explain why many cigarette ads display great flexing of masculine muscles? the woman, too, is a victim of advertising. vogue cigarettes catch her eye. why? because they come in pastels. how perfectly exciting for the female world! just think! she can now buy cigarettes to match her wardrobe; and what's more, she can purchase matching cigarette cases and lighters in any color of the rainbow, with jewels or without. yes, we are frequently victims of suggestive devices. dr. ernest dichtter, head of the institute for motivational research, has conducted a series of studies for ad agencies on the subject of smoking. he states, "people smoke, not because of the taste of cigarettes, but because smoking provides them with certain psychological satisfactions they can get in no other way." he adds that cigarettes are involved in a man's struggle for survival, stability, and security. i am afraid i cannot agree with dr. dichter, for i believe that a man can survive and can find security without cigarettes. he needs food, he needs shelter, he needs love and companionship; but can't he satisfy these needs in ways other than smoking? rationalization makes a strong impact on our lives. are we cultivating rationalizations as an excuse to smoke? i am afraid we are. no doubt 50 per cent of us here have used as an excuse to continue smoking, this very common remark, "if i ever stopped smoking, i would gain ten pounds." perhaps! a cigarette at 4p.m. does not contain the calories that a milkshake does. but the healthy way to lose excess pounds is to eat the right kind and the right amount of food. we again rationalize when we buy filter tip cigarettes. we assure ourselves that the filter reduces any danger, but according to the july, 1957 edition of reader's digest, "the tar and nicotine reduction possible through a filter ranges from 7 to 17 per cent. these percentages are too small to be really protective." with a perfect filter no smoke could seep through─just hot air. so many people believe that filters are the solution that filter tips will account for about half of this year's output. can't we admit that we are being duped to form a habit that is detrimental to mankind─a habit that leads to addiction? so you begin to wonder if maybe you should quit smoking─that, after all, you are an individual. what would happen to you tomorrow if some conclusive proof should suddenly come forth─proof that cigarettes are a one-way ticket to death? what would you do? who do not smoke, you've seen why others start the habit and the risks they are taking. be on your guard. you, who have the urge to start smoking─you are perched on a fence and can jump to either side. which will you choose? and you, who are already confirmed smokers, are now confronted with the hardest question of all. if you wanted to stop smoking, "could you? could you break the addiction?" jean nicot, the frenchman who gave his name to nicotine, believed that he had discovered a miracle drug. today we try to filter out nicotine because of its harmful nature. the modern jean nicots believe that smoking makes the woman more attractive, more desirable─the man more masculine, more independent. we say we are thinking men! well, are we thinking? cigarette, anyone? 到位了。神經命令心臟跳動加快。腎上腺激素開始湧動。神經促使人手腳處的血管開始收縮。皮膚的温度下降了,手指、腳趾漸漸變涼,血壓升高了。這些症狀是不是發生在一個酒鬼或一個吸毒成癮者接受"治療"的第一階段?抑或是一個人正被彈射到外層太空?不!它們僅來自於吸了一支煙。 然而,儘管這些吸煙有害健康的證據毋容置疑,並不斷向人們發出警告,但吸煙人數還在不斷增多。農業部估計,今年的香煙消費量將達到人均180包(15歲以上者)。這將意味着每人吸多少支?3600支。 為什麼吸煙是一個如此嚴峻的問題?因為它不是許多人所認為的只是一個習慣問題。不,它遠比習慣來得厲害。一個習慣能輕易地改變,而吸煙一旦上了癮,就難以自拔了。芝加哥大學的丹尼爾·舒爾伯格曾經對西北一所較大的大學的226名學生就吸煙習慣問題做過一次調查──是什麼原因使他們開始吸煙的?他們從吸煙中獲得了什麼快感?他們是否有戒煙的打算?從舒爾伯格的調查結果來看,那些學生想戒煙,但是辦不到。 如果一個人吸煙上了癮,他即在生理上對香煙產生了依賴感。如果這不是一種癮的話,那它是什麼?是什麼力量能促使一個人在零度以下的惡劣天氣裏出門去買煙?如果必要的話,他甚至會在深夜開十英里車去尋找一個仍在營業的雜貨店。如果那不是一種癮的話,它又會是什麼?它怎麼會使原先一個迷人的女孩變成一個無所事事、遊手好閒的人? 不久前,我和一個剛剛戒煙的教授進行了一次談話。他告訴我你們大多數人已知道的:一旦抽上香煙,當心!因為要戒煙幾乎不大可能。於是,我問他,他是如何養成了一天吸一包煙以上的習慣並持續了十年之後,能成功地戒掉了煙癮。讓我們來聽聽他的故事吧! "唔,我在一開始的第一個星期裏減少了吸煙的數量,每天只抽半包。在那段時間裏,我很容易發脾氣。稍有點不如意,就會使我極度煩躁,腦袋也像要裂開似的。第二個星期開始,我每天抽五支煙,那時,我的精神狀態更糟了。在接着的第三個星期裏,我試着嚼口香糖和薄荷糖,當然還有煙斗杆。坦白地説,能不能堅持下去,我也不能肯定。可不知怎麼的,我還是做到了。" 聽了他的故事,你們中的許多人知道他在説什麼了。因為你們也曾經嘗試過戒煙,只是你失敗了。現在,讓我們花幾分鐘來分析一下吸煙的根本動機。 這樣説,也許我們能夠讓那些不吸煙的人(我很高興我自己屬於這一類),在要吸煙時就打消這個念頭,並鼓勵那些已經上癮的煙民減少吸煙數量。 讓我們從外界壓力影響這個角度開始分析。我們希望成熟,希望一下子能長大。我們需要平衡、自信和朋友,我們更期盼被人接受。 這種希望接受的願望使我想到了一件事。那是去年秋天,在一所大學的女生聯誼晚會裏發生的事。那時,正在舉行一個爭取新會員的活動。一個聯誼會成員給一位新生一支煙。這個新進大學的女孩急切地想取悦他人,不願做得與眾不同,於是,她自信地脱口而出:"噢,好的,我很想來一支!"於是,那個遞煙的人劃了根火柴,平靜地伸出手去給她點煙。與此同時,這個新生慌慌張張地拿着煙迎了上去。看着她的樣子,遞煙的人震驚了。你可想像那複雜的表情。一方面,她努力抑制着自己,不讓自己笑出聲來;另一方面,她又深深地理解這個可憐的新生──她以前從未吸過煙。而這個新來的女孩在這個激動的時刻,什麼也不顧,只在意她是否被接受了。 讓我們再來看一個例子。在一堆人中,坐着一個女孩,她不知道自己的手該怎麼放。一開始,她用手反覆地撥弄着左耳後的捲髮,接着翻弄着錢袋,想找東西握在手裏,這樣可顯得自然些。突然一個念頭從她腦子裏冒出來,她記起在外衣口袋裏還有一包健牌煙。為什麼她不早些想到它們呢?她一直認為吸煙的女人看上去更成熟一些。拿着香煙打發雙手該有多方便啊!方便?是的。老練?不!在許多年前,一個女人要是知道如何吸煙,人們會認為她很老練,男人們也會被她吸引住的。但是現在,這種觀念早就不存在了,因為,現在每個人都知道如何吸煙,甚至八歲的孩子也不例外。現在,不吸煙可能反而是件新鮮事了。 現在讓我來問你,如果一個女人坐着,雙手交叉着優雅地放在膝上,而另一個女人,雙手一支接着一支地抽着煙,哪一個更有魅力?有一個女人不需要任何物體來平衡她的手腳,另一個女人卻認為煙能使她對男人更具誘惑力。作為一個男人,具體地説──你喜歡哪一個?好好看看一個女人吸煙的樣子,你會看到,她狠命地吸煙,撅起雙脣發出一陣"嘶嘶"聲,接着往後一仰,把煙深深地吸了進去然後就像火箭發射時噴出的尾氣一樣,大口地噴出煙霧。她甚至還會向你吐煙圈。這麼一個女人,你能説她俊俏,你能説她有女人味? 在我們的生活中,暗示的力量是促使我們行動的另一個關鍵因素。你有沒有這樣的經歷,當你看到別人打呵欠時,你也會不由自主地打起呵欠來?原來,這已影響了你,在你還沒意識到你將幹什麼之前,你已經這麼幹了。那麼,這種同樣的暗示力量會不會也促使你去吸煙呢?怎麼不會呢?尤其是廣告媒體的影響。 我回想起最近我從《芝加哥論壇》上剪下來的一個名叫"莫斯特立·馬拉基"的卡通畫,內容講的是馬拉基逛進了一個雜貨店,他站在櫃枱前一言不發,卻使勁地抓腦袋,最後,他向售貨員嘀咕道:"我想買有頭腦的人吸的煙,可是我好像想不起它的名字來了。"可憐的馬拉基,他想要的僅僅是一包總督牌香煙,廣告商卻把它描繪成有頭腦的人抽的香煙。畢竟,每個人都認為自己是一個有頭腦的人,人都是這樣認為自己的,他無論如何應該吸自己牌子的煙。 廣告商們不斷地玩弄男人的自我,即激發他們那種想要精力充沛,充滿活力、健康力的內心願望。萬寶路,起了帶頭作用。它的煙盒上是一個長滿胸毛的男子漢。於是,萬寶路就有了一個粗獷的、豪放不羈的男人形象。這難道不正解釋了為什麼眾多的香煙廣告裏,展示的往往都是男性肌肉的強有力的收縮嗎? 女性,同樣也是廣告的受害者。時髦的香煙往往吸引了她們。為什麼呢?因為那些煙往往以彩色粉筆狀出現。女人的世界是多麼令人激動啊!試想一下,她們能夠買到與衣服相配的煙了。此外,她們還能夠買到與煙匹配的五彩繽紛的或鑲嵌着奪目的珠寶的煙盒及打火機。 的確,我們常常是帶有誘導性物件的受害者。動機研究院的負責人歐內斯特·狄徹特博士,曾為廣告公司在吸煙方面進行過一系列的研究。他指出:"人們吸煙並不為了煙的味道,而是因為通過吸煙,他們能夠獲得一種通過其他方式難以得到的心理上的滿足。"他補充道,香煙同一個人為了生存、穩定、安全而奮鬥有很大的關係。我恐怕不能同意他的觀點。我認為,一個人沒有煙也能夠找到安全感。一個人需要的是食物、住房、愛與友情。難道他不能通過吸煙以外的方式來滿足他的這些需要嗎? 自我辯解對我們的生活有很大的影響。我們是不是在把自我辯解用作吸煙的藉口?恐怕是這樣的。毫無疑問,我們中有一半的人把這類話作為一個藉口來繼續吸煙,"我一旦戒煙,我體重將增加10磅。"可能會這樣!在下午4點吸的一支煙裏不含有一杯牛奶所含有的熱量。但是,健康的減肥方法不是通過吸煙,而是吃合適的和適量的食物。 當我們購買帶過濾嘴的香煙時,我們又自己辯解、找理由,我們使自己相信這個過濾嘴能過濾掉任何有害物質。但根據1957年7月版的《讀者文摘》上的一篇報道:"通過一個過濾嘴,焦油和尼古丁含量可能會減少7%~17%。可這百分比太小,遠遠起不到真正的保護作用。"如搞出一個完美的過濾嘴,那就沒有煙而只有熱空氣能夠通過了。如此多的人相信這種過濾嘴是一個解決吸煙有害的好方法,以致於它的產量大約佔今年捲煙總產量的50%。難道我們不承認我們正在受騙,慢慢養成一種對人類有害的習慣──一種會讓人沉溺於其中,難以自拔的習慣? 因此,你開始懷疑你是否有可能戒煙──畢竟,人是一個獨立的人。如果明天一些結論性的論據一下子成真,完全證明了香煙是通向死亡的單程票,那麼,對你有什麼影響?你會怎麼做?你,不吸煙的人,親眼目睹了為什麼另一些人染上了吸煙的習慣,他們正冒着怎樣巨大的風險。所以,當心!你,有想吸煙慾望的人,正坐在欄杆上,你隨時可跳向任何一邊。你會選擇哪一邊呢?嗨,你,一個已經吸煙成癮的人,現在正面臨着嚴峻的問題。如果你想戒煙的話,"你能嗎?你能剋制你的煙癮嗎?" 讓·尼古丁,這個給尼古丁命名的法國人,相信他發現了一種神奇的藥物。今天,我們試圖把尼古丁過濾掉,因為它是有害的。而現代的讓·尼古丁們卻相信吸煙能使女人更有魅力,更令人嚮往,男人更男性化,更獨立。 我們自認為是有頭腦的人。那麼,我們真的有頭腦了嗎?香煙,誰想來一支?

本站範文網[]

第三篇:機會偏愛有頭腦的人

機會偏愛有頭腦的人

文學院07級漢一班李雪

記得75週年校慶的一次校友報告會上,當劉新來校長講完《大學生活與未來人生》之後,同學們問得最多的問題就是考研了。的確,現在嚴重的就業形式的使每個人都認為考研無疑是最好的出路,其實也未然,想想大學的主題是什麼?是單純求學,兩耳不聞窗外事,還是修身求學,一心追求真善美?是做單一型人才,還是做複合型人才?是被動學習還是主動奮鬥?考研與就業,如何抉擇,我認為考研只是就業的另一種途徑而已,選擇一條路認真的走下去才是最重要的,因為機會偏愛有頭腦的人。

如果選擇了考研,全面的鍛鍊自己是必不可少的。03級的一位師兄曾對我説當時班上有一半以上的人蔘加考研,然而考上的卻只有三分之一,不能説餘下的人是失敗的,但這樣無疑會在很大程度上影響到自己的人生,再轉入社會工作時,就會比那些一早就準備好工作的人稍遜一等了。對於我們這些經過大浪淘沙走進象牙塔裏的大學生來説,知識是可以很快掌握,但與此同時必須學會能力的培養。考研首先必須學會認知,認知能力的獲取是未來社會生存的一項基本技能,考研不成功至少可以學到一項基本的技能。其次,“創新是一個民族進步的靈魂,是一個國家興旺發達的不竭動力”作為一位科研工作者,在大學就應該學會以全面的眼光關注世界範圍內的科技進步和社會發展,掌握本學科的科研動態,而不能僅僅為了考研而學習,那將是一個學習上的失敗者。即使是考研也要注意把求知與做人完美結合,良好的習慣,優秀的品質,高尚的品德卻不是朝夕可得的,只有把兩者結合,才能成長為一個對社會有用的人,才能實現自己的人生價值。

如果選擇了就業,那麼最為一個亞社會——大學中的人來説,與社會聯繫的越緊密,機遇就越多,也就越能鍛鍊自己,以後走上社會了,能做的事也就越多,所以在大學裏就要為以後的就業積累相關的經驗。也許工作的熱情可能因為所看到的所經歷的一些事而改變,但是不必懼怕,只有去適應或承受,才能做出是繼續堅持還是退出。對於一個工作者首先必須好好的利用在公共場合説話的機會,展示或鍛鍊自己,會增加自己的膽識與魄力。其次不要怕得罪人,有人反對,有人支持,然後自己做出決定才是精彩的人生,這樣可以訓練自己的冷靜力,有大事時,能安靜並快速想出辦法,是一種能力。還要記住,社會是一個最喜歡打碎人的尊嚴的地方,除了自己,沒有人會去保留,在大學工作時,就要懂得利用這個空間鍛鍊自己,讓自己的尊嚴有足夠大的承受力。

進入大學,就是一個新的環境,所有的過去對於別人來説都是一張白紙,前途選擇才開始。將來是趕快畢業直接工作,還是考研究生繼續深造?將來是進入藍領、白領還是金領職業層次?不管怎樣選擇,改變命運的鑰匙掌握在自己的手裏,成功的機遇總是偏愛有頭腦的人。

所以從現在開始,讓琅琅的書聲迴盪在美麗的校園,讓矯健的英姿奔跑在運動場上,讓多彩的畫筆描繪絢麗的未來,讓敲擊的鍵盤連接五湖四海,讓天使的翅膀掛在雲帆,讓激昂的青春迎風飛揚。

第四篇:選擇決定你成為什麼樣的人

選擇決定你成為什麼樣的人

據國外媒體報道,亞馬遜ceo傑夫-貝佐斯(jeff bezos)宣佈收購《華盛頓郵報》的消息震撼了全世界,這位身價超過250億美元的富豪再次讓業界感到疑惑。 他這麼做的目的究竟是為了什麼?貝佐斯2014年在普林斯頓大學畢業典禮上的演講或許能夠給我們一些啟示。

8月5日,亞馬遜創始人傑夫-貝佐斯(jeff bezos)以2.5億美元收購《華盛頓郵報》的消息,震撼了整個世界。

這位身價超過250億美元的富豪,以不到1%的財富入主擁有135年曆史的美國老牌報紙傳媒,從科技巨頭變身為媒體大亨。他會如何利用破壞性創新,改造連年虧損的報紙產業,這引發了業界的無限想象。

有業界人士猜測,他可能會把《華盛杜郵報》化整為零,讓讀者用他們想要的方式,讀到想看的內容。但也有人認為,貝佐斯會用亞馬遜最擅長的數據分析,為讀者“訂做”個性化新聞。現在,大家都在期待,貝佐斯能否振興傳統媒體產業,從而描繪出新的藍圖。《紐約時報》指出,現年49歲的貝佐斯是個目光長遠的思考着,“他是那種願意頂住華爾街對高利潤的要求,並對公司未來進行長遠投資的人。”

貝佐斯砸錢買下《華盛頓郵報》,是一種投資,更是一種選擇,而這種選擇往往意味着困難重重。

2014年,在母校普林斯頓大學的畢業典禮上,貝佐斯勉勵年輕人,善用自己的天賦,做出對的選擇。因為,“人生到頭來,我們的選擇,決定了我們是什麼樣的人。”以下是貝佐斯演講的主要內容:

小時候,我經常到外公外婆家的德州牧場過暑假,幫忙修理風車、幫牛打疫苗、做些雜活。每天下午,我們還會在一起看電視連續劇。

外公和外婆是我摯愛、崇拜的兩位老人。他們都是露營拖車俱樂部的會員,這是一羣由airstream露營車車主組成的車隊,車隊成員定期結伴在美國、加拿大到處旅遊。我們每隔幾年參加一趟,直接把路用車掛在外公的車子後面,就上路了。三百多輛拖車連成一線,非常壯觀。

其中一次,大約在我10歲時。一路上,我都在車子的後座上隨意打滾。外公在開車,外婆坐在他旁邊,不停地抽着煙。而我很討厭香煙的味道。

那個年紀的我,只有有機會就喜歡算來算去,做些簡單的加減乘除練習。比如,估算汽油的行駛里程數,或者計算買東西花了多少錢。

“抽一口香煙,壽命要縮短兩分鐘。”

當年,有個警告抽煙的廣告,我已經忘記了細節,只記得大意是説,你只要抽一口煙,就會減少幾分鐘的壽命,好像是兩分鐘吧。那天,我決定幫外婆算算看:她每天抽多少根煙,每根煙要抽幾口等等。

抽一口煙,短命兩分鐘

當年,有個警告抽煙的廣告,我已經忘了細節,只記得大意是説,你只要抽一口煙,就會減少幾分鐘的壽命,好像是兩分鐘吧。那天,我決定幫外婆算算看:她每天抽多少根煙、每根煙要抽幾口等等。

最後,我很滿意地算出來一個差不多的數字,把頭伸到車子前座,拍了拍外婆的肩膀,很得意地説:“如果抽一口煙會縮短兩分鐘的壽命,你已經使自己的壽命減少了整整九年。”直到今天,我都清楚的記得,當年説完這句話,接下來發生的事情,完全都出乎我的意料。我原本以為,自己的聰明會受到稱讚:“傑夫,你好聰明,竟然會做這麼複雜的計算,算出一年總共有多少分鐘,還會用除法的出最終的結果??”,但我的期待並沒有發生。結果是,外婆聽到我的話後,馬上哭了出來。我呆坐在後座,看着外婆哭泣,不知道怎麼辦。這時,原本一直安靜開車的外公,把車子停在公路旁邊。他下了車,走到另一頭開車門,等我出來。

我惹上麻煩了嗎?外公是個非常有智慧、卻不多話的人。他從來沒有罵過我,但這次,他會不會開口責備我?會不會叫我回到車上,去跟外婆説對不起?我跟他們之間,從來沒有遇到過這種情況,無法判斷可能的後果。

就這樣,我們站在露營車旁,外公看着我,一段沉默後,他温和地、平心靜氣地對我説:“傑夫,總有一天你會明白,做一個善良的人,要比做一個聰明的人更加困難。”善良比聰明更難做到

今天我要告訴你們的,就是“天賦”和“選擇”之間的差別。聰明是一種天賦,而善良是一種選擇(cleverness is a gift, kindness is a choice.)。天賦得來容易,但選擇往往很困難。你們如果不夠謹慎,就可能被自己的天賦所誤導,一旦誤導,就可能危害到你所選擇的價值觀。

你們是一羣擁有許多天賦、能力的人。

未來,你們的聰明才智必然會派上用場,因為你們即將邁向一個充滿驚奇的世界。

將來,我們會發明出大量製造乾淨能源的方法;我們會組裝出超級迷你的機器,用來穿透細胞,進行修復。就在這個月,科學界傳出了了不起的突破:我們創造出了第一個人工合成生命。我也相信,人類終會完全解開腦部的祕密。

凡爾納(jules verne,法國冒險小説家)、馬克吐温、伽利略、牛頓??,這些勇於探索和開創的歷史人物,一定都渴望,重新誕生在這個人類天賦愈來愈多的時代。

然而,你們將如何運用自己的天賦才智?有朝一日,你們將以什麼自豪,你的才智,還是你的選擇?

16年前,我想出了創辦亞馬遜的主意。那時,我看到互聯網的使用量,每年成長2300%,從來沒見過任何趨勢可以成長得這麼快。既然這樣,何不成立一家擁有幾百萬種書籍、在實體世界根本不可能存在的在線書店?這念頭深深吸引了我

當年,我剛滿三十歲,結婚才一年。我跟太太麥肯西説,想辭掉工作,去搞這個很可能會失敗的瘋狂創業計劃。但萬一真的失敗,以後要做什麼,我還沒想到。麥肯西也是普林斯頓畢業的,今天就坐在台下第二排,她給我的回答是,放手去做吧。

從小,我就是個業餘發明家,發明過一種用廢輪胎做成的自動關門器;一種用雨傘和錫箔拼湊、但是很難用的太陽能鍋子;還有一種用來唬弄弟弟妹妹的烤盤警報器。我一直想要當個發明家,麥肯西也鼓勵我,追隨自己的熱情。

當時,我在紐約一家金融公司上班,與一羣非常聰明的人共事,還有個非常厲害、讓我非常佩服的老闆。

當我去跟他説,想要自行創業,成立一家專門在網絡賣書的公司時,他把我帶到中央公園散步,仔細地聽我説明,最後告訴我,“聽起來是很好的想法,但是,它會更適合一個還沒有找到好工作的人去嘗試。”他説服我,多考慮兩天再做決定。

人生意義,就在於你的選擇

對我來説,這真是個困難的選擇,最終,我決定放手一搏。因為,萬一試了以後失敗,我並不會後悔;但如果不去試試看,我可能永遠都會耿耿於懷。考慮了很久,我最後選擇了一條比較不安全的路,去追隨我的熱情。今天,對於這個選擇,我感到非常自豪。

明天,由你們自己主宰的人生,即將開始。你會如何善用自己的天賦?做出哪些選擇?你會放任自己怠惰,還是追隨熱情?

你會服從教條,還是堅持創新?

你會選擇安逸人生,還是服務與開創的人生?

你會在批評之下屈服,還是堅持信念?

你會在犯錯的時候矇混唬騙,還是認錯道歉?

你會在遇到逆境時放棄,還是堅毅不屈?

你會是個嘲諷者,還是個建造者?

你會用傷害他人的方法展現聰明,還是寧願選擇善良?

我要斗膽做個預測。當你們活到八十歲,在某個安靜的沉思時刻,回到內心深處,想起自己的人生故事時,最有意義的部份,將會是你所做過的那些選擇。人生到頭來,我們的選擇,決定了我們是什麼樣的人(we are our choices.)。替你們自己寫一篇精彩的人生故事吧。

第五篇:選擇愛我的人結婚

結婚是每個人心中的神聖的字眼,它昭示着兩個人願意把心交付給彼此。死生契闊、與子成説,執子之手,與子偕老。倘若在茫茫人海中你尋得到這樣一個人,你愛着他、他亦愛着你,那就請你們好好珍惜,切莫荒廢了這命定的姻緣。可是,紛繁複雜的世界告訴我們,很多時候兩情相悦的婚姻只是夢中的一景,難以觸摸。因此,我們往往更多面臨的是我愛的人和愛我的人之間的選擇。我方的觀點是:選擇一個愛我的人結婚。箇中緣由,且聽我細細道來。

選擇是挑選之意,是一種自主意識過程。結婚是男女雙方結為夫妻、約定一生的行為過程。愛我的人是他愛我比我愛他多一些的人。愛我的人是最在乎我的人,在乎我的喜、在乎我的憂,在乎我的每一個表情、每一個動作、每一句話。

我方認為選擇一個愛我的人結婚,基於以下理由。

首先,從幸福感的角度來説,愛我的人相較於我愛的人能夠給我帶來更多的幸福感。幸福是什麼?幸福不是長生不老,不是大魚大肉,不是權傾朝野。幸福是每一個微笑的生活願望達成。幸福是一顰一笑都有人關注,幸福是一分一秒都有人呵護。幸福是有人愛,有人願意終其一生與我共同經營那個稱作“我們的家”的地方。反過來説,付出可能是一種幸福,可是這種幸福會長久嗎?如果愛沒有迴音,再堅強的心一定也會疲憊的吧。得不到迴應的愛,守不住承諾的婚姻,其間的傷該有多重。

其次,從婚姻的穩定性角度來説,選擇一個愛我的人結婚更安心、更有利於婚姻的穩定。選擇一個愛我的人,他愛我是事實。選擇一個我愛的人,他愛不愛我是未知。我握不住別人的愛,可是我管得住自己的心,既然選擇了就絕不會辜負了這一份盛情。同樣是婚姻,一邊是雙向的努力,而另一邊只是單方面的付出。兩種婚姻,何種穩定顯而易見,而穩定才是婚姻的根本哪。

再次,不去選擇我愛的人是一種放手。放手是一種對愛情和婚姻的超然,所以有一首歌説:對你最好的疼愛是手放開。放手讓他飛翔,放手讓我愛的人去尋找屬於他自己的幸福。與其用婚姻去綁住一個我愛的人、在我愛的人面前苦苦支撐着自己的卑微,不如用婚姻去給我愛的人和我自己一個幸福。成全,成全的不只是別人的瀟灑與冒險,還有自己的碧海藍天。

標籤: 多篇 頭腦 精選
  • 文章版權屬於文章作者所有,轉載請註明 https://wenfanwang.com/yanjianggao/yingyu/4q3wv.html
專題